Forgot to take process photos. Model looks sick though!
Had an issue with the spring supplier but other than that she went together with no problems.
Stood up to the heavy handed Ant Nevin tests. No worries
Monday, 6 June 2016
Model tests

Frosted Acrylic with white light test (Success)
Attempt to get printed Acetate to glow (Fail)
Lighting frosted clear acrylic with a magenta LED, Seemed promising, but the nature of rastering meant it was either 100% or 0% tone with no transparency level so we had to write this idea off.
Testing the stacked image with a single (average) light source from behind
Thursday, 2 June 2016
Thursday, 12 May 2016
Council meeting notes.
Council meeting
notes.
Art adviser: Sarah
-Set format for
public art is far easier to work with. Courtney place light box in high demand
because of this set format.
- Most of the public
sculptures have come around from the Wellington sculpture trust. Most projects
cost around $200,000.000 and take several years.
-Council project
more temporary.
-Creative
communities grant. $2000-4000 (council recommend on grant)
-Toi Poneki gallery.
-Urban dream
brokerage
- Upstream (friends
of central park) site-specific artworks.
-17 Tory street +
the pyramid club. Sites
Events manager:
Delia
- - Planning process starts several months prior.
- -Wellington based artist have strong draw card
in councils eyes.
Public art activity proposal application.
Public art activity
proposal application.
One. Proposal overview.
-Concept. Produce an
art installation that will be usable at night and day.
-Context. Our
installation will touch on historical and topographical elements of the city.
- Process. We will
collaborate between ourselves, class mates and council to resolve our ideas.
Two. Proposal location.
Opera house lane.
Swan lane
Mason lane
Lombard lane.
Three. Proposal duration.
Initially for the
duration of the lux festival with the potential of permanent installation.
Four. Environmental considerations.
Minimal impact.
-Drill holes to
create fixtures.
-Power needed for illumination.
Five. Installation considerations.
-Potential
disruptions for pedestrians
-Short closures.
-Cherry picker
-Height assistance.
Six. Maintenance
-Minimal maintenance
desired.
Seven. Security + Safety.
-Elevated nature
voids vandals.
-Engineers
consideration.
Eight. Removal.
-Same as
installation but backwards.
-Very small trace of
artwork left.
Nine. Timeframe
-TBC
Ten. Budget.
TBC
Thursday, 5 May 2016
Monday, 2 May 2016
Phone photos
Just some images of process that have been on my phone
Mocking up prototype #1
Saville Overseeing craftmenship
Mock up portraying effect well
Stacked CMYK layers
Saturation level perhaps need adjusting
Effect becomes more apparent from angle
Chuffed
Multi colours providing interesting effects
Concept/Prototype intending to display an opposite stalactite effect on the contours of Wellingtons hilly environment. We have since disregarded this idea in order to focus on our other CMYK concept
Safety first - Great to see
Larger scale CMYK providing work better than smaller scale
Young Harry very happy with his perspex mock up
Although aesthetically very pleasuring we are not confident this will have the opacity variance needed in order to create a full colour image. Issues surrounding wind need to be addressed also
Large scale map printed in order to brain storm locations for display images. This was helpful in finding correlations between spots as we see this as a requirement
Some exploring to be done!
#finwoods
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)








